rcts.org.uk

Presumably this is a result of all the work being carried out at Old Oak Common. It's not so much 'work' at Old Oak Common. The depot is being decommissioned ready to demolish it. The London end sleeper work is permanently at Reading now, but not the heaviest work. That is permanently at Penzance (...

This InterCity sign is still present at Chippenham:

Thanks all for your information so far. A summary of findings to date is the bottom table on http://www.railwaycodes.org.uk/stations/notserved.shtm . I have not put Fenchurch St on that section as, according to some info I have found, the 'LNER' workings were not removed until 1948 (veracity of sour...

According to the RCH junction diagrams, Shepreth was GN.

Thanks Peter. I suppose this particular example continued through to closure (I hadn't really considered LT in my original question, erroneously assuming everything would become BR in 1948).

All, Were there ever any stations pre-nationalisation that were run by one company but served only by another? If so, where (and ideally with dates if known)? To illustrate, a modern day example could be Hinckley station, operated by East Midlands Trains for a decade (so far) but only served by Cros...

Members should also be aware that this so-called 'vision' is more a history lesson than a look forward. There is next to nothing 'new' that hasn't already been announced before (and in many cases, is already there!).

I have recently stumbled across information that suggests that Batley station will be served only by Transpennine Express in due course. Does anyone know from when this will take place, please? May 2018 timetable?

Thanks!

Thanks MisterC . One place that mentions 308991-993 as parcel units is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_308 (with usual caution regarding the source); as you can see it doesn't mention 308994/995 at all. Additionally, I found something about 308991-993 on http://www.railuk.info/ but ...

I make no secret of the fact that my interest lies in the railway rather than the trains. As such, my 'train' records are limited and I hope that the good inhabitants of RCTSforumland can help. What is the history behind electric multiple units 308994 and 308995? I've found that 308991-993 were parc...